Page cover

Open source Frameworks for Agent-Based Penetration Testing

The evolution from automated scanning to intelligent AI agents is reshaping how security professionals approach pentesting assessments. Discover the main frameworks leading this transformation.

The cybersecurity landscape is experiencing a fundamental shift in testing methodologies. Where traditional penetration testing relied on manual processes and basic automation, a new generation of open source frameworks now harnesses artificial intelligence to conduct semi-autonomous security assessments. These agent-based penetration testing frameworks represent more than just another tool; they're changing how we approach offensive security testing.

Unlike proprietary solutions that lock users into closed ecosystems, open source penetration testing frameworks offer complete control over your testing environment. Organizations can deploy these frameworks with locally hosted language models, ensuring sensitive data never leaves their infrastructure. This approach addresses one of the most pressing concerns in AI-powered security testing: maintaining confidentiality and data privacy.

Below, we examine three of the frameworks leading this transformation, each offering unique approaches to autonomous security testing.

Leading Open source Agent-Based Penetration Testing Frameworks

CAI (Cybersecurity AI)

CAI represents a comprehensive production-ready penetration testing framework designed around agent-based architecture. This platform offers extensive multi-agent support and robust automation capabilities, with over 300 AI models supported including OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Ollama for local deployment.

CAI supports multiple simultaneous testing engagements and can orchestrate different agents working in parallel across various security tasks. Its modular architecture allows security teams to integrate custom tools and methodologies, making it adaptable to specific organizational requirements. The framework includes built-in security tools for reconnaissance, exploitation, and privilege escalation, making it particularly valuable for complex enterprise environments where multiple attack vectors need thorough testing.

Strix

Strix distinguishes itself through sophisticated multi-agent collaboration and proof-of-concept validation capabilities. Rather than simply identifying potential vulnerabilities, Strix agents actively demonstrate exploitability through working proof-of-concepts, reducing false positives significantly.

This methodology uses a graph-based workflow model where specialized agents handle different aspects of testing, from web application analysis to network reconnaissance. As agents discover new information, others automatically adjust their approaches, creating dynamic testing coverage that adapts to target environments in real time.

PentestGPT

PentestGPT established the foundation for AI penetration testing when researchers introduced this family of tools in their USENIX Security 2024 paper. Encompassing both academic research and practical implementations, PentestGPT combines LLMs with pentesting tooling to automate offensive security tasks while maintaining research-backed methodology.

The framework operates through three interconnected modules: reasoning, generation, and parsing. This architecture allows it to orchestrate multiple scanners, maintain context throughout complex attack chains, and generate appropriate commands while analyzing results. PentestGPT has demonstrated significant improvements in task completion rates, though like all AI-driven tools, it requires human oversight to address potential hallucinations and ensure safe execution.

Choosing the Right Framework for Your Organization

While these three frameworks represent some of the most established options, the landscape of open source penetration testing frameworks continues expanding rapidly. Selecting the right solution depends on your organization's maturity, team expertise, and specific security requirements.

Data sensitivity requirements deserve careful consideration. While all these frameworks support local model deployment, implementation complexity and resource requirements vary significantly. The key: evaluate your team's technical capabilities alongside your security needs, as some frameworks require more sophisticated infrastructure and AI expertise to deploy effectively.

The Human Element in AI-Driven Security Testing

Despite advancing automation capabilities, human expertise remains central to effective penetration testing. These frameworks multiply efficiency and coverage, but ethical hackers still provide the contextual understanding, business logic analysis, and creative problem-solving that machines are working hard to replicate.

Today, the most effective approach combines AI automation with human insight. Frameworks handle reconnaissance, initial vulnerability identification, and routine testing tasks, freeing skilled pentesters to focus on complex attack chain development, business impact assessment, and strategic vulnerability prioritization.

Need Expert Penetration Testing?

For organizations seeking comprehensive security testing, we partner with leading offensive security specialists who combine automation capabilities with deep human expertise. Our pentesting partners utilize both traditional methodologies and modern AI-assisted frameworks to deliver thorough assessments that reflect real-world threat scenarios.

Our specialists focus on:

  • Targeted attack scenarios: Business-critical simulations using both manual techniques and AI assistance to uncover complex vulnerability chains

  • Regulatory compliance: Specialized assessments for PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other industry standards

  • Real-world risk prioritization: Expert analysis that goes beyond automated findings to identify truly exploitable vulnerabilities

REQUEST YOUR PENTEST

Last updated

Was this helpful?